Voix qui se chevauchent : suivre les tours de parole

P44.b2-listening.16 · Audience: guest, language-pro, it-ml

Unité CO-18 · campagne 13 · le débat déborde, votre grille tient bon.

The hardest CO documents are debates where speakers overlap, interrupt and finish each other's sentences — wrongly. The skill is not hearing every word; it is keeping the attribution ledger straight: who claimed what, who corrected whom, and what survived the collision.

Four repair patterns to track:

  1. Repair after interruption. laissez-moi terminer : mille emplois directs, hors sous-traitance. The speaker who resumes usually sharpens the claim. The post-interruption version is the one that counts for comprehension questions.
  2. Self-clarification. J'y étais, et je me suis abstenu, ce qui n'est pas la même chose. When a speaker concedes half of an accusation (being present) but corrects the other half (voting for), the distractors will offer the uncorrected blend.
  3. The moderator's traffic control. Trente secondes pour conclure, ensuite madame Aït répond, et personne ne coupe. Moderator turns carry no opinion — but they announce the order of what follows, which is free structure for your notes.
  4. The hijacked sentence. — Notre région est la première… — …la première en chômage, oui ! An opponent completes the sentence with their own ending; the original speaker then restores it (la première en création d'entreprises). Attribute each ending to its actual author.

Grid advice: one line per speaker, arrows for corrections. The items below are four collisions; every question is an attribution question.

Loading the exercise...

Checking your progress...

Ask the mentor about this module

Ask a question about this content. The mentor explains and grounds its answer in what you are studying; asking is recorded as a learning signal, not a grade.

Ctrl/Cmd + Enter to send