Concéder pour mieux réfuter : le paragraphe de contre-argumentation

Unité PE-23 · campagne 14 · l'argument que vous offrez à l'adversaire est celui qui vous rapporte le plus.

The concessive move from earlier units gets promoted here into a full counter-argument and rebuttal paragraph — the single structure that most reliably separates a solid B2 copy from a merely correct one. The DELF grid rewards capacité à argumenter, and examiners read one-sided copies as weak argumentation: a candidate who never mentions the opposing camp has not debated, only declaimed.

The paragraph runs in two beats:

1. Concede — state the strongest objection honestly, opened by a concessive marker: « Certes, l'interdiction des voitures en centre-ville compliquerait la vie de certains commerçants. » Pick the objection a real opponent would raise, not a strawman you can knock over for free.
2. Refute — pivot with toutefois / néanmoins / pourtant and demolish the objection with a fact, a counter-example, or by exposing its limits: « Toutefois, l'expérience des villes voisines montre que la clientèle piétonne compense largement cette perte. »

Three rebuttal moves worth memorising: cite evidence (les chiffres montrent que…), narrow the objection's scope (cette crainte ne vise que le télétravail mal encadré, non le télétravail lui-même), or accept the cost and show the benefit outweighs it (ce coût, réel, reste inférieur aux économies produites). What never works: insulting the opposing camp, restating the objection as if it refuted itself, or waving it away with « là n'est pas la question ».

Watch the connector pairs: certes… mais, il est vrai que… néanmoins, sans doute… pourtant all carry the concession. D'ailleurs and de plus do not — they stack arguments, they concede nothing.

The practice drills the structure, the cost of one-sidedness, rebuttal quality, and the connector inventory.

Loading the exercise...

Checking your progress...